Around 2000 the American company Mountain Hardwear, renowned for clothing and equipment for outdoor sports launched their Mountain Kilt, meant for hiking. It was extremely light weight and fast drying, had however, due to the total absence of pleats, little to do with a kilt. Technically it was a wrap skirt.
For this reason some kilt wearers rejected it whereas others to the full accepted it, despite they claimed they would never ever dream of wearing a skirt. I bought one back in 2004, wore it once or twice that summer and a few years ago once more. For hiking it was too long and not wide enough to be really comfortable.
A few years ago Mountain Hardwear replaced their Mountain Kilt with a new one, called the Elkommando Kilt. It is a bit shorter and, due to pleats, wider which is an enormous advantage compared to the original Mountain Kilt. And last not least, visually it is much more a (utility) kilt. Mountain kilts come and go. For the time being the Elkommando is not availble, it seems.
You might also realize that, if you don't take care, you could, step by step, come too far from what was your intention when starting wearing kilts. I think a little experiment I made that summer 2004 illustrates what I mean. My Mountain Kilt versus a cheap H&M skirt.
Hardly anyone can tell the difference, I'm sure. Both of them will most likely be regarded just skirts. If a skirt is OK with you and your surroundings, go wear it, your decision. If not, and you put emphasis on a manly appearance, better stick to "real" kilts.
For my part the Mountain kilt ended up in a charity shop, but perhaps someone out there is still wearing it, man or woman?